The organization of the Lowenman
Papers was a tedious and difficult process, and involved quite a lot of
creative arrangement on my part. No doubt the professional cataloguer would
have many a justified criticism of my methods, and to all such criticism, I
plead guilty.
The Lowenman Papers consist, in the
main, of three parts: excerpts and citations from existing volumes, Julian
Lowenman’s own journal entries, and his correspondence with other academics
(?). I have chosen to organize them in such fashion as to provide the smoothest
narrative possible, a method which I may describe as roughly chronological,
roughly thematic.
For the sake of clarity and
simplicity, the Lowenman Papers are identified in this fashion:
The
letters LP, Lowenman Papers, appear at the heading of each separate document.
If the document was culled from the work of another writer, the document will
bear the heading LP-ex., meaning that this particular document is excerpted
from another source. All documents bearing the heading LP-ex. are numbered
according to the order in which I placed them in the text—an admittedly
subjective process. Each, hopefully, has its proper reference in the form of a
footnote at the bottom of the page on which it appears.
Those documents removed from his
journal bear the heading LP-j., and are numbered in the order in which I found
them. He did not date his entries. Thus, LP-j. 1, etc.
Those documents which I culled from
his correspondence are headed LP-c., numbered and dated. They appear,
interspersed throughout the text, in chronological order. Thus, LP-c.1: 8/15.
Each heading appears in boldface
print.
I have also included my own
observations, ruminations, and anecdotes concerning the compilation of the
Lowenman Papers. Each is identified by Ed., meaning editor’s note.
Naturally, I bear and accept all
responsibility for any shortcomings or mistakes in the Lowenman Papers. Playing
the role of a Boswell is not an easy task. Especially when your particular Dr.
Johnson is dead. Especially when your particular Dr. Johnson was quite mad. And
especially when your particular Dr. Johnson seems to have gone out of his way
to be cryptic, frustrating, and mysterious.
No comments:
Post a Comment