Friday, September 28, 2012

Aside: A Word About the Organization of the Lowenman Papers


The organization of the Lowenman Papers was a tedious and difficult process, and involved quite a lot of creative arrangement on my part. No doubt the professional cataloguer would have many a justified criticism of my methods, and to all such criticism, I plead guilty.
            The Lowenman Papers consist, in the main, of three parts: excerpts and citations from existing volumes, Julian Lowenman’s own journal entries, and his correspondence with other academics (?). I have chosen to organize them in such fashion as to provide the smoothest narrative possible, a method which I may describe as roughly chronological, roughly thematic.
            For the sake of clarity and simplicity, the Lowenman Papers are identified in this fashion:
            The letters LP, Lowenman Papers, appear at the heading of each separate document. If the document was culled from the work of another writer, the document will bear the heading LP-ex., meaning that this particular document is excerpted from another source. All documents bearing the heading LP-ex. are numbered according to the order in which I placed them in the text—an admittedly subjective process. Each, hopefully, has its proper reference in the form of a footnote at the bottom of the page on which it appears.
            Those documents removed from his journal bear the heading LP-j., and are numbered in the order in which I found them. He did not date his entries. Thus, LP-j. 1, etc.
            Those documents which I culled from his correspondence are headed LP-c., numbered and dated. They appear, interspersed throughout the text, in chronological order. Thus, LP-c.1: 8/15.
            Each heading appears in boldface print.
            I have also included my own observations, ruminations, and anecdotes concerning the compilation of the Lowenman Papers. Each is identified by Ed., meaning editor’s note.
            Naturally, I bear and accept all responsibility for any shortcomings or mistakes in the Lowenman Papers. Playing the role of a Boswell is not an easy task. Especially when your particular Dr. Johnson is dead. Especially when your particular Dr. Johnson was quite mad. And especially when your particular Dr. Johnson seems to have gone out of his way to be cryptic, frustrating, and mysterious. 

Chapter 1: A Short Introduction to the Lowenman Papers


 A SHORT INTRODUCTION TO THE LOWENMAN PAPERS

Professor Q.X. Baghatch
Lecturer in Late-Early-Modern Central European Renaissance Thought
Chair, Department of Esoterics
University of North Waukepetonsett

Since it has apparently fallen to me to put the affairs of Professor Julian Lowenman, assumed deceased, in order, then I must do it, and do so with a good will and as much conscientiousness as I can muster. Although I will confess, at the outset, that I do so with a great amount of trepidation. Professor Lowenman remains as mysterious now as he ever did, and his work likewise remains almost impenetrable.
            As to why my colleagues have chosen me to take over the custodianship of Professor Lowenman’s papers—well, again, I must confess, that is nothing more than a happy, or unhappy, coincidence. An accident of acquaintance.
I knew Professor Lowenman as well as anyone, I suppose. We had been colleagues for fifteen years at the time of his disappearance, although I cannot say that I knew him well. As well as anyone knew him, but he was as unknowable a man as ever lived.
My tenure as Assistant Adjunct Instructor of Late-Early-Modern Central European Renaissance Thought at the University of North Waukepetonsett had begun a year before Professor Lowenman arrived here. As junior members of the Department of History, young men still wet behind the ears, so to speak, we felt a certain kinship. Likewise, the extreme specialization of our disciplines threw us together in a way that our elder colleagues, stolid and conservative men with titles like “Professor of English History,” “Professor of European Diplomacy,” could never understand. Professor Lowenman liked to say, as we sat, cramped in the tiny office that we both shared, whiling away the office hours we kept for students who never came, that there should be a separate department—the Department of Esoterics—for us.
            I used to think he was joking, but he was in deadly earnest. Soon after the publication of his first book, “An Inquiry into the Similarity of the Respective Subconscious Free-Associative Natures of Grussetian Folktales and Indo-Aryan Narrative Ballads,” (still considered a classic in its field) (whatever that field may be), he began to pester the administration for the creation of just that. Successfully, to my great surprise. And so it was that the Department of Esoterics came to be founded at the venerable University of North Waukepetonsett. Not only founded, but endowed, as well. And generously.
            Well do I remember the day when, my eyes slightly glazed over, I first surveyed my new office in the new department. Wonder of wonders—my own office! Wonder of wonders—a beautiful and spacious wood-paneled office in the historic Van Palterpelt Building, a building heretofore reserved for the offices of the very highest administrative levels of our institution! Not only would I, myself, never have dared breach the concept of an entirely new department, I would never have had the temerity to suggest that I merited an office in the storied Van Palterpelt Building!
            And yet, Professor Lowenman had done both, and our colleagues in the Department of History could only watch amazed as we took up residence in that historically significant building.
            I am a bit of a plodder by nature, so it was fortunate that I had hitched my wagon, again, so to speak, to the rising star of Julian Lowenman—a remarkable man by any estimation. He was possessed of that type of nervous energy, that sort of restless brilliance that cannot ever be limited to one field of endeavor. So the Department of Esoterics came into being—the kind of place where Professor Lowenman and I could study and teach whatever it was that interested us at the moment.
            I said that the Department of Esoterics was established successfully, and it was. But it was not established without some minor strife. To be sure, our colleagues in the more traditional departments fulminated against us. Oh, how they shrieked that a Department of Esoterics could never be considered a serious field of study! I particularly remember Professor Chauncey Trillingham Portlehart, of the Department of History…
            “Esoterics?” he spluttered, turning an unhealthy shade of apoplectic puce. “Whoever heard of a Department of Esoterics? Esoteric what? Exactly what do you plan to teach, Lowenman?”
            “Things of interest to the esoterically-minded,” Lowenman answered, as if the question bored him. Our faculty meetings tended to be explosive affairs, after Professor Lowenman joined the staff.
            “But what are you training students for?” whined Professor Addie Midgewater of the Department of Art History.
            At this question, Lowenman jumped to his feet.
            “A mockery of the ideals of liberal arts!” he shouted. “What am I training them for? What am I training them for? I am not training them for ANYTHING, Professor Midgewater! What is, after all, the University of North Waukepetonsett? A trade school? A technical-vocational institute? No, no, a thousand times no! We are an ivy-covered, red-brick, Colonial-style institute of higher learning, not some practical-minded, tax-payer funded, outcome-based educational facility of flickering neon lights and cinder-block walls covered with a thick layer of poorly-applied, lead-based paint of calming shade! We have no metal-shop, no experimental fields of hybrid corn, no Department of Auto Mechanics! We are a gloriously anachronistic East Coast elite college, are we not? Our students are housed in dormitories older than the United States, in worse repair than the entire city of Philadelphia, but saturated with character! We are the place where tweed-clad guardians of arcane knowledge stroll in a leisurely, pipe-puffing fashion across leafy quads, surrounded by undergraduates whose great-great-grandfathers went here! Here, if nowhere else, will a Department of Esoterics thrive! Here, and only here, will it find a suitable home! Only at such a place as the hallowed halls of the University of North Waukepetonsett will it find existence!”
            He tended to get rather worked-up.
            “But for heaven’s sake, man,” persisted Midgewater, a tiny woman given to wearing long, jangly earrings and togas. “There must be some… some purpose to it, must there not?”
            “Hear, hear,” grunted the bilious Professor De Quagney of the Department of Classics. “Some purpose. Some raison d’ĂȘtre.”
            “Raison d’ĂȘtre?” Lowenman gaped, awestruck at the concept of something so mundane, and he turned dramatically to the elegant, black-clad, black-haired woman to his left. “Raison…d’… etre? Correct me if I am wrong, my dear Professor Le Romagne, but is that not French for… reason for being?”
            “You are correct, mon cher Lowenman,” Professor Le Romagne, of the Department of Romance Languages responded, screwing a cigarette into her long, mother-of-pearl-mouthpieced cigarette holder.
            “Reason for being?” Lowenman glowered, rocking back and forth on his feet. “My God, ladies and gentlemen, we of the University of North Waukepetonsett, we NONE of us have a reason for being! In the name of all the saints, my dear colleagues, if the parents of our students had any brains at all, they would send their precious poppets to the nearest State college, where they would learn all sorts of practical subjects with practical applications, but they don’t, and so we continue to exist. We charge them the price of a new Jaguar each year for the privilege of studying the arcane, the useless and the completely superfluous. If we had a mission statement, and I doubt that we do, because we were founded before such things became fashionable, I believe you would find that the Department of Esoterics would fit in nicely.”
            “Lowenman’s right, of course,” nodded our Chancellor, Hadlingbury Fotherfield IV, putting an end to the debate. “We’re bloody useless, and everyone here knows it. We survive on a great name alone. If it ever became common knowledge, we’d be through in a trice. The Department of Esoterics is perfect. It looks as though we have such confidence in ourselves that we’re willing to fund another chair. That’ll make the rest of them sit up and take notice. It’s a nice front.”
            “A nice front it may be,” globbered Professor Portlehart, “but Chancellor… in the Van Palterpelt Building? The hallowed Van Palterpelt Building? The, dare I say it, sacred Van Palterpelt Building?”
            “And why not?” Lowenman snarled, rounding on Portlehart. “Are you ashamed? Are you humiliated by it? Should we be secreted away, back in the depths of Fangboner Hall, where the skeletons of scientifically-minded alumni hang in the darkness and dust? I think not, my dear Portlehart. We must display our inefficiency! We must parade our arcanity!”
            “I don’t think that’s a word,” muttered Professor Pardontadger of the Department of English, but it didn’t matter. Once Lowenman got going, it was safer to get out of his way, and he was magnificently worked up now. His untrimmed mop of black curls was quivering as he fairly hopped from one foot to the other, and his high, narrow brow was sweating. His huge tortoise-shell glasses slid precariously close to the end of his long, curved nose.
            “We must veritably GLORY in the very IDEA of the Department of Esoterics!” he howled, as though he were Peter the Hermit exhorting medieval Europe to a Crusade. “Let all and sundry who pass through these gates see who and what we are! Let the Department of Esoterics be the first thing prospective students and donors see when they pass through our gates! Let our department be a proud banner of pointlessness!”
            He was spinning around and waving his arms madly now. There was a mad glint in his eye, and his face was a study in the ecstasy of fanatical devotion to a cause.
            “Would it be too much, Lowenman,” ventured Professor Peter Askinwald of Archaeology, “to ask what courses you and Professor Baghatch intend to teach?”
            “WE MIGHT NOT TEACH ANYTHING AT ALL!” shrieked Lowenman. “What more blatant statement of superfluity could we make than that?”
            “Oh, enough with the histrionics, Lowenman,” grumbled Chancellor Fotherfield, whose pipe had been knocked from his hands by the dervish-like Lowenman, irritably. “You’re going to break something. Askinwald’s question is a fair one. What courses do you intend to offer?”
            “That is a damned fine question, Chancellor,” Lowenman answered, dropping with a thud into his chair. He pulled a yellow silk handkerchief out of his breast pocket and mopped his streaming brow with it. “What do you think, Baghatch?”
            I shrugged.
            “Well,” Lowenman said, furrowing his brow and steepling his fingers, “I thought we might begin with a quick overview of the similarity of witchcraft practices in the Caucasus to those of the Friuli region in northern Italy. I’ve been curious about that for quite a while.”
            “What about something like the impact of Renaissance Humanism in Central Europe?” I piped up. “Fascinating study, that.”
            “Oh, honestly, Baghatch,” Lowenman wailed, “you got your degree in that. How dull. Can’t you think of something else? The effect, say, of how the extinction of the Moa-bird affected the Maoris’ conception of the Aboriginal myth of the dreamtime, say?”
            “I’ll get right to work on it,” I promised.
            “Gobbledygook,” sputtered Portlehart.
            “Rancid nonsense,” whined De Quagney.
            “Arrant balderdash,” groaned Pardontadger.
            “Perfect,” Chancellor Fotherfield said crisply. “Well then, that’s settled. I think we can call this little meeting a success.”
            “How did I do?” Lowenman whispered to me as we all filed out.
            “Very well, I think,” I answered him. “Lowenman, honestly, do you really believe what you were saying in there?”
            “Certainly not,” he responded. “Do I look like a madman?”
            To be perfectly frank, there was something of the manic clinging to his long, rangy person, but I didn’t tell him so.
            “Then why are we…”
            “Because it’s fun, man!” he grinned, shaking me by the shoulder. “Because it’s marvelously fun! Don’t you see? Now we can do whatever we want! We’ve been given carte blanche to study whatever we want for the rest of eternity!”

*          *          *

            He was right, of course. A department such as the Department of Esoterics had, indeed, carte blanche to do whatever it wanted, and there was no one better suited to such a field than Julian Lowenman.
            His interests ranged from Central Asiatic folklore to obscure Turkish dialects to evolutionary biology to high art, and they constantly grew in number. I never knew anyone else so passionately devoted to learning for its own sake. He devoured books on every subject in languages that I never knew existed. He could lecture with equal fluency on the Albanian succession struggle of 1375 and on the breeding habits of the hoatzin-bird of Central America, and what is more, he could divine connections between them that no normal human being would have noticed. In the course of a minute, he could flit from freshwater tropical fish (he was quite a fancier of them) to Sufi theology and mid-Victorian chimney structure without making the listener feel as though he had changed the subject. His mind was a gloriously anarchic melange of information.
            Although I learned much from him, he was curiously silent about himself and rarely brought up the topic. I knew that he was a descendant of an ancient rabbinical dynasty of Prague—he blamed a “mad Talmudic ancestor” for his powers of recall and his ability to discern connective threads between areas of knowledge—but I never found out anything else about his family. I never found out exactly what he had studied, or where he had done so. I never knew if he had any siblings.
            He was rumored to live in a tiny apartment on the far side of Waukepetonsett, but I never knew exactly where. It was said that the place was crammed from floor to ceiling with books and fishtanks filled with strange and vicious species. That might have been merely gossip. Nonetheless, I don’t doubt it. He once strolled into the Department with bandages on each of his fingertips.
            “Good Lord, Lowenman,” I gasped. “What happened to you?”
            He waved airily.
            “Oh, I made the hideous mistake of putting the Lake Tanganyika Rottweilerfish in the same tank as the Surreptitious Weedmocker,” he explained. “They are both aggressive species, and I should have known, only I forgot where I had put my fish-books. I found them under the refrigerator, but not before I had to reach in the tank and extricate the little darlings from each other’s mouths.”

*          *          *

            He was an animated lecturer, and his classes were very well attended, but whereas I strove for some kind of focus (a slave, I suppose, to the prevailing educational theory that students should come away from a class knowing something), he didn’t. On the few occasions I sat in and listened to a Lowenman lecture, he perched, cross-legged, on the edge of his desk and lectured, stream of consciousness, on whatever happened to be on his mind at the moment. His students sat spellbound, but not a one of them took a single note.
            “There’s no point,” one of them told me later. “It doesn’t have anything to do with the test.”
            “What’s the test about?” I asked.
            “Well, he gave us three essay questions,” the student replied, pulling a crumpled sheet of paper out of a notebook. He smoothed it and handed it to me.
           
            YOU MAY CHOOSE TO ANSWER ONE OF THE FOLLOWING. YOU MAY CHOOSE TO ANSWER ALL THREE. YOU MAY CHOOSE TO MAKE UP YOUR OWN QUESTION AND ANSWER IT. I WILL NOT TOLERATE A BLANK SHEET OF PAPER. LET ME BE ENTIRELY CLEAR ON THIS POINT.

1)      As is well known, the Mongol hordes enjoyed a game similar to modern day football, only played on horseback instead of foot, and with a live goat instead of a ball. What are the chances that Marco Polo witnessed this game during his visit to the court of the Great Khan, and what, if any, effect did this have on the future of European sport?
2)      The concept of the Enlightened Despot held sway in Europe approximately until the Congress of Vienna. In your estimation, is the Enlightened Despot an oxymoron, and is it possible to practice both enlightened despotism and cannibalism?
3)      The theory of punctuated equilibrium purports to explain the gaps in the fossil record. Had he been a Darwinian, how would Adam Smith have reacted to the rather sudden occurrence of birds with teeth?

“And what will you write about?” I asked the student as I handed his test paper back to him.
“I think an asteroid killed the dinosaurs,” he answered. “I think I’ll write about that.”

*          *          *

I believe it was Alexander Pope who said, “A little knowledge is a dangerous thing.” I fully agree with this statement, but I believe the converse to be true as well. Too much knowledge can be just as dangerous, or perhaps it is merely the wrong sort of knowledge that is dangerous.
Julian Lowenman—brilliant, eclectic, quite possibly mad, was not at all discriminatory about what he put into his head. He was completely amoral, apolitical, non-judgmental, free of agendas. He was an aesthete of learning—the acquisition of knowledge was to be undertaken for its own sake. All and sundry went gliding into his brain.
But ideas have consequences. Knowledge is power, but power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely. Information fueled his burning intellect, but it consumed Julian Lowenman.
            Julian Lowenman is no longer among us. Where he is, I don’t know. I don’t doubt that he is dead. But I don’t know for sure, and the one thing that I do know for sure is that I will never know for sure. Did knowledge kill him? Or was there something else? Something darker?
            I have said that he was secretive, and he was. As I read through his papers, copies of articles, his own notes, the story of what happened to him becomes clearer. But I have no answers. Murky water may settle a bit, and you may begin to discern shapes on the floor of the lake, but if it is murky enough, those ominous aquatic shadows will never gain enough clarity to make out exactly what it is at which you are staring. And whatever happened to Julian Lowenman is murky, very murky indeed.
            But enough. Enough of these disconnected ramblings about the man. It is not my task to explain him or his fate. Any attempt to do so would be futile. All I can do, all I can be expected to do, in my plodding, methodical manner, is to try and impose some kind of order on his papers. I have tried to do so.
            The true answers will never, I suspect, be known. All we have is the Lowenman Papers, and an apartment full of fishtanks, whose occupants have probably by now all eaten each other without the hand of their master to separate them. 

Why I'm Doing This.

The Polish writer Witold Gombrowicz once said, "I like smuggling the most up-to-the-minute contraband in antiquated charabancs"--in other words, telling contemporary stories, dealing with contemporary themes, in traditional formats.

I'm with him. I'm a sucker for mixing up old-timey stuff with brand-spankin' new stuff. I like the vintage 1950's TV on the console of the Doctor's TARDIS in the new, rebooted version of "Doctor Who." I like the idea of a Stutz Bearcat tricked out with an MP3 player. I like the idea of air conditioning and elevators in old Welsh castles. Mixing up the old with the new benefits both concepts. It gives the new stuff a sort of gravitas, a grounding in something that makes it look traditional and comforting. Gives it style. And it gives the old a new lease on life, making it relevant in today's world. I like it when people can make the antiquated and the contemporary coexist. It makes them both cooler.

I'm especially fond of the way stories were told in the old days.

Time was when most major newspapers published serialized novels. After you got done with the front page, the classifieds, the Important News of the Day, you'd turn to the back page where there was another chapter of an unfolding story. Every week a new chapter would appear, which gave the reader the (probably unintended) feeling that he or she was actually living out the story with the characters. The reader would tear through the chapter, reach the end, and say, "And? And??? And what then? What's next?"

Nowadays, serial novels, if they're remembered at all, are considered kind of shlocky--hack-work pounded out on the quick and dirty for a cheap buck. But serious writers, and good ones, also serialized their work. Charles Dickens did. Sir Arthur Conan Doyle serialized his four Sherlock Holmes novels (A Study in Scarlet, The Sign of the Four, The Valley of Fear, and The Hound of the Baskervilles). Tolstoy and Dostoevsky published most of their novels serially. And in this country, Harriet Beecher Stowe published Uncle Tom's Cabin as a serial.

It's a great way of telling a story, isn't it? There's a reason why so many people still watch soap operas and read comic books. Ongoing stories--serialized stories--happen, in terms of the reader's perspective, in what's called now "real time." They suck you in and leave you wondering, "What happens next?"

Not so many years back, my favorite living writer, Michael Chabon--himself no mean practitioner of the art of mixing up the old with the new--published his novel Gentlemen of the Road in serial format in the New York Times Magazine. It was great fun to read, and when he finally published it in book form, it retained the week-to-week character of the original version.

So I've decided to mix up the old and the new myself. I'm going to serialize here, in digital format, a book.

I wrote it some years ago, and it's sat gathering dust on my hard drive ever since.

It's called The Lowenman Papers. I was driving home from work one day, and this phrase began repeating itself in my head: "Julian Lowenman, eaten by books." I have no idea where the name Julian Lowenman came from. I've known Lowensteins and Lowenhaupts, but I've never met a Lowenman. Nor do I know where the idea of being eaten by books came from. But as I turned the phrase over and over in my head, an idea for a story began to emerge, a story of a man engulfed and eventually consumed by information.

Julian Lowenman himself is, of the characters I've created in other (unpublished) books, my favorite--as Lady Charlotte Bertie described Disraeli, "He is wild enthusiastic and very poetical." He's more than half-nuts, interested in everything, intense to the point of irritating, and really kind of a pain in the ass to just about everyone he encounters. I suspect that if I met him in real life, I'd want to hit him in the face with a sock full of gravel. But he was fun to write. If anyone actually bothers to read this, I hope you enjoy reading about Julian as much as I enjoyed writing him.

Maybe I'll take a stab at illustrating it, too. Anyhow. The Lowenman Papers. Enjoy.